Erhard Busek on
stability
Alexandra
Alexandrova
THE Stability Pact for South
Eastern Europe was adopted on June 10, 1999, at
the EU's initiative, in the wake of the Kosovo
crisis. In the founding document, more than 40
partner countries and organisations undertook to
strengthen the countries of South Eastern Europe
in their efforts to foster peace, democracy,
respect for human rights and economic prosperity
in order to achieve stability in the
region.
Erhard Busek, Special
Co-ordinator of the Stability Pact for South
Eastern Europe, who attended the conference in
Sofia, spoke to The Sofia
Echo.
Mr Busek, although this is
a regional conference, it also has international
repercussions. Can the Balkans provide any
alternative to initiatives by the international
community and organisations such as
NATO?
"I think it is not a matter of
competition, but rather of co-operation. This is
quite necessary because the problems concerning
security, both on the military side and the
civil side, can only be solved in a regional
co-operation, in European co-operation and
global co-operation. NATO fits into this and the
Stability Pact fits into this, and the
perspective of entering the European Union fits
to this. Therefore this is a valuable
contribution. Take the question of security. For
the moment, it is a bigger problem than anything
else, even as compared to political instability
or ethnic cleansing. Security is quite more
important, because it does a harm to the
position of the region in the European and
global public. I am fighting for investment in
the region and security has been one of the main
factors why we have a lot of problems to bring
foreign investment here."
How do
you assess the current situation in
Macedonia?
"It's better to support the
government in the effort to keep the things down
and get the situation stable. We should not
speak about a crisis, we should speak about
solutions.
In comparison to other crises
we have all over the world, the development in
South-eastern Europe is quite a very good one.
Do not forget that at the end of 1999 we were at
the end of four wars and now it is 2003, and
four years later we are sitting together on one
table discussing our common future. It is not
very helpful to mention always it is a region of
crises. In comparison with the crises in Iraq,
or the Middle East, the Balkans have achieved
some development. The improvement of democracy
is an irreversible process. The election results
are fine, monitored by the OSCE, well, for sure,
a better political system has to be developed,
but this does not work from one day to the
other. We need improvement of infrastructure by
regional co-operation and, for sure, investment,
investment, investment to get a better economic
situation."
Why, then, do many
analysts say the Stability Pact does not
work?
"From the infrastructure projects,
73 per cent are under construction and, I think,
if somebody is able to do a bridge over the
river Danube or build up a highway in two months
I will certainly congratulate him. I think
everything needs some time, yet, in general, the
evaluation of stability is a very positive one.
There are some unsolved problems, that's for
sure - Kosovo and to a minor extent Bosnia and
Herzegovina, but this is an internal matter. We
need a dialogue between Belgrade and Pristina
for Kosovo and we need a closer co-operation
between the parts of Bosnia and Herzegovina. We
can only assist in that, which we
do.
How do you assess Bulgaria's
prospects to join the European Union?
"If
Bulgaria is developing very well, achieving the
criteria of EU, that would be a big
contribution. For me Bulgaria is one of the
stable points in this development, on which you
can trust, and you have to keep that
direction."
|